mHealth brings opportunities to better understand how conditions impact everyday life and develop solutions that work.
Via Marie Ennis-O'Connor
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Nilambari Mane's curator insight,
August 17, 2016 11:05 AM
Interesting read on how patient-centric apps are gaining momentum and present great business opportunities for Pharma Companies.
Sign up to comment
rob halkes's curator insight,
January 16, 2014 5:33 AM
Well, I agree very much with David about the potential and the benefits of using mobile technology in trial studies. Yet, I think that the very patients are entitled to not just that. I know of cases in which patients have been supported and guided on an intensive schedule to their participation in the trial. But, alas, when the trial was over, so the support and guidance disappeared. Why not continue this in the very support at therapy? My take is that both FDA and EMA should take steps to guarantee that services rendered during trials should be continued, by the participating institutes and business of care and research to the services for the participating patients. Isn't that self evident? Please endorse this, by your comments!
|
rob halkes's curator insight,
August 1, 2016 4:50 AM
Health apps should do what they promise! At the moment they need to take a diagnostic feature and use personal physics to arrive at advice or conclusions about the health status of the person who uses the app, they are considered not to be 'just' an "app" but a medical device. At that condition they need to adhere to and be certified by several criteria attached to 'medical devices". Developers should know about this, which the more professional ones will. Rightly so! PatientView has developed a website MyHealthApps that presents an inventory of the better Health Apps.
Pharma Guy's curator insight,
August 1, 2016 8:38 AM
Also read “FDA Won't Regulate ‘Low-Risk’ mHealth Apps as Medical Devices. But Battle Looms Over Defining ‘Low Risk’"; http://sco.lt/5kkDyr |