M-HEALTH By PHARMAGEEK
255.0K views | +0 today
Follow
M-HEALTH  By PHARMAGEEK
M HEALTH...and Mobile marketing - Mobile, Ipad and Apps.. #mhealth #ehealth #healthapps
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Lionel Reichardt / le Pharmageek from Digital Disruption in Pharma
Scoop.it!

Doctors Say They Recommend mHealth Apps to Patients, But Patients Say They Don't!

Doctors Say They Recommend mHealth Apps to Patients, But Patients Say They Don't! | M-HEALTH  By PHARMAGEEK | Scoop.it

A survey conducted by Nielsen on behalf of the Council of Accountable Physician Practices (CAPP) finds that, at most, 52 percent of primary care physicians have recommended that their patients use an mHealth app or device to track their health. Yet only 4 percent to 5 percent of consumers surveyed say their PCP has made such a recommendation.

 

This means that either physicians are making the effort but their patients are ignoring the advice, or patients are looking for that guidance but it isn’t coming from their doctors.

 

The survey reached a familiar conclusion in how each generation perceives mHealth and telehealth.

 

It found that consumers rarely use video visits (only 5 percent total), but those age 34 and younger are twice as likely to use and want them than those age 65 and older.

 

The same discrepancy was seen in the use of text reminders for medication and health measurements and online scheduling tools.

 

more at : http://mhealthintelligence.com/news/do-doctors-patients-take-mhealth-seriously

 


Via nrip, Pharma Guy
Pharma Guy's curator insight, November 3, 2016 10:21 AM

Someone's not being truthful :)

 

Related articles: “AMA Survey Finds That Many Physicians Are Enthusiastic About Digital Health Tools, But Few Currently Use Them”; http://sco.lt/8b9r97 and “Do Patients Rely on Mobile Healthcare Apps More Than Their Doctors?”; http://sco.lt/5HSTrN

Rescooped by Lionel Reichardt / le Pharmageek from Health, Digital Health, mHealth, Digital Pharma, hcsm latest trends and news (in English)
Scoop.it!

Acceptance Factors of Mobile Apps for Diabetes by Patients Aged 50 or Older: A Qualitative Study #mhealth #hcsmeu

Acceptance Factors of Mobile Apps for Diabetes by Patients Aged 50 or Older: A Qualitative Study #mhealth #hcsmeu | M-HEALTH  By PHARMAGEEK | Scoop.it
A lack of additional benefits and ease of use emerged as the key factors for the acceptance of diabetes apps among patients aged 50 or older

Via Anna Niemeyer, Olivier Delannoy, Celine Sportisse
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Lionel Reichardt / le Pharmageek from Health innovations, mhealth, digital ...
Scoop.it!

Could health apps save your life? That depends on the FDA

Could health apps save your life? That depends on the FDA | M-HEALTH  By PHARMAGEEK | Scoop.it

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regulates everything from heart monitors to horse vaccines, will soon have its hands full with consumer health apps and devices.

 

The vast majority of the health apps you’ll find in Apple’s or Google’s app stores are harmless, like step counters and heart beat monitors. They’re non-clinical, non-actionable, and informational or motivational in nature.

 

But the next wave of biometric devices and apps might go further, measuring things like real-time blood pressure, blood glucose, and oxygen levels.

 More clinical apps

The FDA is charged with keeping watch on the safety and efficacy of consumer health products. Lately, that includes more clinical apps as well as devices you might buy at the drugstore, like a home glucose testing kit.

 

“It’s these apps that the FDA says it will regulate,” David Bates of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Physicians Organization told VentureBeat in June. These apps will have to go through the full 510(k) process,” he said.

 

Dr. Bates chaired a group to advise the FDA on how to review health apps for approval, and on how the FDA should advise developers.

“It was intended to help them think through the risk factors involved with these products and then give guidance on how to stay within the guidelines,” he said.

 

“The device makers were asking from some guidance from The FDA on what types of things would be accepted and what wouldn’t,” Bates said.

Bates believes the FDA wants to use a light regulatory touch when looking at new medical devices. “The FDA definitely wants innovation to continue in clinical devices,” he said. “In general the FDA knows that the vast majority of apps are just informational.”

 

The FDA’s final guidance focuses on a small subset of mobile apps that present a greater risk to patients if they do not work as intended.

 

Health apps go mainstream

The big software companies (Apple, Google, and Samsung) have brought attention to, and lent credibility to, apps and devices that do more than count steps. These companies are building large cloud platforms designed to collect health data from all sorts of health apps and devices.

 

more at http://venturebeat.com/2014/07/21/health-apps-are-changing-so-must-the-fda/

 


Via nrip, Clara Hamelin
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Lionel Reichardt / le Pharmageek from New pharma
Scoop.it!

FDA declines to scrutinize claims by “low risk” mhealth apps, devices. What’s the takeaway?

FDA declines to scrutinize claims by “low risk” mhealth apps, devices. What’s the takeaway? | M-HEALTH  By PHARMAGEEK | Scoop.it

FDA said it will ease up vetting general health and wellness apps, but it will scrutinize clinical applications and devices. Does this mean the FTC will step up?

 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued final guidance on “low-risk” digital health apps and devices for general health management 18 months after it  came out with draft guidance.

The document offers information on the kinds of apps and devices for which it will and won’t take action. Apps promoting or maintaining a healthy weight or to assist with weight loss goals and healthy eating are OK.  The guidance says that companies can make claims that their apps and devices can help with healthy lifestyle choices to reduce the risk of chronic conditions such as Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease or improve their management. But those lifestyle choices have to be advocated by the likes of the American Heart Association or American Association of Clinical Endocrinologist or peer-reviewed medical journals.

So what are some examples of what’s not OK? Claims that a product will treat or diagnose obesity, an eating disorder, such as bullimia or anorexia, or an anxiety disorder. Digital health entrepreneurs are also encouraged to ask themselves the following questions:

Is the product invasive?
Is the product implanted?
Does the product involve an intervention or technology that may pose a risk to
the safety of users and other persons if specific regulatory controls are not applied, such as risks from lasers or radiation exposure?

If the answer is yes to any of the above, they need to assume their products are considered clinical applications, will be scrutinized and should act accordingly.

My takeaway from the guidance is twofold. It’s a question of resources. Although there are thousands of general wellness apps, more and more medical device and pharma companies are developing digital health devices and apps of their own.  Second, the Federal Trade Commission has shown it is willing to take action against companies that it deems to be making false health claims about their apps and devices.

 


Via rob halkes
rob halkes's curator insight, August 1, 2016 4:50 AM

Health apps should do what they promise! At the moment they need to take a diagnostic feature and use personal physics to arrive at advice or conclusions about the health status of the person who uses the app, they are considered not to be 'just' an "app" but a medical device. At that condition they need to adhere to and be certified by several criteria attached to 'medical devices". Developers should know about this, which the more professional ones will. Rightly so!

PatientView has developed a website MyHealthApps that presents an inventory of the better Health Apps.

Pharma Guy's curator insight, August 1, 2016 8:38 AM

Also read “FDA Won't Regulate ‘Low-Risk’ mHealth Apps as Medical Devices. But Battle Looms Over Defining ‘Low Risk’"; http://sco.lt/5kkDyr

Rescooped by Lionel Reichardt / le Pharmageek from mHealth- Advances, Knowledge and Patient Engagement
Scoop.it!

To deal with chronic disease, patients will need better mobile health apps

To deal with chronic disease, patients will need better mobile health apps | M-HEALTH  By PHARMAGEEK | Scoop.it

Of all the potential calamities facing humanity, the one that few people can argue about is that of the global population that is growing in numbers, age, size and incidence of chronic disease. In Australia, 3.6 million people have diabetes or pre-diabetes. In the US, that number was 29.1 million in 2012, or 9.3% of the population. The number of people with pre-diabetes in 2012 however was a staggering 86 million.

Diabetes is the 6th leading cause of death in Australia and the 7th in the US.

 

http://theconversation.com/to-deal-with-chronic-disease-patients-will-need-better-mobile-health-apps-35283

 


Via Ignacio Fernández Alberti, Celine Sportisse, eMedToday
Decide Consulting's curator insight, January 7, 2015 12:47 PM

Mobile apps encourage healthy behavior. Everyone needs custom preventive and routine care. @decidemobility

Andre Mouton's curator insight, January 8, 2015 3:53 PM

Please look outside of the US for options to consider.

Rescooped by Lionel Reichardt / le Pharmageek from Patient Self Management
Scoop.it!

Health apps: where do they make sense? A patient opinion-informed white paper

Health apps: where do they make sense? A patient opinion-informed white paper | M-HEALTH  By PHARMAGEEK | Scoop.it

Conclusions of the first ever cross-stakeholder, pan-european seminar on health apps, held at the King's Fund on 28 October 2013.

 

The five key messages:

 

1. Overhauling healthcare systems–making them patient-centric

2. Engaging doctors in the prescribing of health apps
3. Overseeing quality standards for health apps
4. Ensuring that health apps remain of a high standard throughout their lifetime
5. Considerations for policymakers wishing to oversee health apps


Via rob halkes
rob halkes's curator insight, March 18, 2014 6:25 AM

Great Read!

Marisa Maiocchi's curator insight, March 21, 2014 2:55 PM

Aportes y conclusiones del primer seminario pan-europeo sobre apps de salud. Muy interesante.